At this
past week’s Council meeting, it was revealed that a home builder had built a
house in such a way to contravene the town’s building regulations. The house was built closer to the road than
is allowed by the current code. This
situation was discovered only AFTER the house was built.
So the Town
was, once again, left in a pickle prompting Mayor Best asked: “How did we get to
where we got?” Unfortunately, that fundamental question was never addressed at Tuesday’s meeting – it needs to be. (listen
to the PACKET’s March 5 Meeting Coverage starting at the 15 minute mark )
There are
essentially three choices when a breach of the regulations is discovered. 1) Get
the home owner to bring the build into spec. 2) Ignore the contravention or 3) Change the regulations. Unfortunately this latest situation is not an isolated occurrence. It has happened before and from previous experience the Town’s attempts to
force builders to fix their contraventions (option 1) have amounted to no more
than a headache for Council and Town staff alike. So, option 2 has been followed by
default.
On this most recent contravention, Council has taken a different tact – they have gone to option 3 and changed the regulations to allow for the build. As Councillor Bailey pointed out, this is backwards thinking, and I would argue that such a move undermines our Town's regulation system.
On this most recent contravention, Council has taken a different tact – they have gone to option 3 and changed the regulations to allow for the build. As Councillor Bailey pointed out, this is backwards thinking, and I would argue that such a move undermines our Town's regulation system.
To truly solve the problem we need to learn from this and previous incidents. Clarenville needs to put a system in place to monitor all builds
before and during the build process (this is a potential role for an
Enforcement Officer, should the Town choose to hire one and baring that, it is a
role for Public Works). Even with 60 or
so builds a year, establishing a building monitoring process should be within the Town’s capacity. We need to learn from this latest incident and stop these “oops” situations from happening again. Unfortunately, it was not at all clear from the meeting that this experience has motivated Council to put a better
monitoring process in place.
Let’s face
it, if we can’t monitor construction in our own town, then our building construction regulations become moot. As we get larger and as
new residents expect more, we need to put the processes in place to ensure our
growing community’s best interests are looked after.
Comments
Post a Comment